Active TopicsActive Topics  Display List of Forum MembersMemberlist  Search The ForumSearch  HelpHelp
  RegisterRegister  LoginLogin  

Home | Load data | Articles | Ballistic Calc | Energy Calc
Handguns
 Handloads.Com Forum : Handguns
Subject Topic: The .44 Special Revisited Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message << Prev Topic | Next Topic >>
JohnK
Admin Group


Avatar

Joined: March 06 2002
Location: Western Washington
Posts: 8010
Online Status: Offline
Posted: October 25 2004 at 5:02pm | IP Logged Quote JohnK


Glen Fryxell has written another article on the 44 Special for us, this time on lighter (aka 45 ACP) level loads in the S&W 696. An excellent, informative read as usual.

The .44 Special Revisited

__________________
Molon Labe!
"People sleep peaceably in their beds at night because rough men stand ready to do violence on those who would do them harm"
Back to Top View JohnK's Profile Search for other posts by JohnK Visit JohnK's Homepage
 
Rod WMG
Senior Member




Joined: July 10 2003
Posts: 2838
Online Status: Offline
Posted: October 25 2004 at 11:10pm | IP Logged Quote Rod WMG

One of my favorite calibers; I enjoyed the read.
Back to Top View Rod WMG's Profile Search for other posts by Rod WMG
 
txpete
Senior Member


Avatar

Joined: October 06 2003
Location: texas
Posts: 2115
Online Status: Offline
Posted: October 26 2004 at 6:22am | IP Logged Quote txpete

good write up,I haven't ever used the 205 gr lfn that I use in my 44-40.this has got me thinking I should try some out of my 24-3 smith.what do you guy think?
pete
Back to Top View txpete's Profile Search for other posts by txpete
 
Rod WMG
Senior Member




Joined: July 10 2003
Posts: 2838
Online Status: Offline
Posted: October 26 2004 at 3:16pm | IP Logged Quote Rod WMG

Pete, what size are those bullets? Does your .44 WCF shoot .427 or .428" bullets? All of my .44 Spl./,44 Mag guns shoot .430 bullets best, including the Smiths.

If you're casting your own, you well know that you can do some things about that including nothing at all, leaving them as cast.

Let us know how it turns out.
Back to Top View Rod WMG's Profile Search for other posts by Rod WMG
 
txpete
Senior Member


Avatar

Joined: October 06 2003
Location: texas
Posts: 2115
Online Status: Offline
Posted: October 26 2004 at 6:44pm | IP Logged Quote txpete

hey rod,my 44-40 is in a ruger vaquero and a navy arms 92 clone.I size 205 gr lfn .429 to get the tighest groups
I guess I have one of the few vaquero's in 44-40 that really shoots.ditto for the NA 92.
with my alloy the bullets drop .430 so maybe I will try some as cast.my 205 gr is a magma mould.
pete
Back to Top View txpete's Profile Search for other posts by txpete
 
Rod WMG
Senior Member




Joined: July 10 2003
Posts: 2838
Online Status: Offline
Posted: October 26 2004 at 11:44pm | IP Logged Quote Rod WMG

Pete, thanks for the info. Glad that .429 works for you. Makes life simpler, doesn't it?

Hope the same success for the Smith.
Back to Top View Rod WMG's Profile Search for other posts by Rod WMG
 
TCLouis
Newcomer




Joined: October 31 2004
Location: Mid TN
Posts: 1
Online Status: Offline
Posted: October 31 2004 at 7:21am | IP Logged Quote TCLouis

I have 2 429215 DC molds. One is the one I used to start my casting with back in 66 and the other came along much later in a trade. The bullets from the original mold shot well from my flatop and Contender barrels. I cast some bullets from the other mold and they shot patterns rather than groups. The molds got mixed up and I have no idea which is which so they languish in an ammo can waiting for the day I cast bullets from both and see if they will shoot out of my current crop of 44s.

The 215 grain offering from Lee (429214) would never shoot out of my Contenders either.

Maybe it is time to dig them all out and try again sized at 0.431" instead of the 0.429 that used to "work".

__________________
LouisB
Back to Top View TCLouis's Profile Search for other posts by TCLouis
 
hawkeye
Senior Member




Joined: November 04 2003
Posts: 202
Online Status: Offline
Posted: October 31 2004 at 10:40am | IP Logged Quote hawkeye

Interesting article, thanks. I'd like to find a good SW 696 at a reasonable price. I keep looking but there don't seem to be many out there and the ones I've seen appear to me to a bit overpriced. Oh well the handgunners lament
Back to Top View hawkeye's Profile Search for other posts by hawkeye
 
pascalp
Senior Member




Joined: July 10 2003
Posts: 445
Online Status: Offline
Posted: November 01 2004 at 3:40pm | IP Logged Quote pascalp

I need some help, i don't understand what Glen mean with "the polygonal rifling of the 696". In doubt i have just slug my barrel, i have a 696-1 with a conventionnal rifling.





Under the alox there is a LEE 429-200-RF, resize to .429 , my caliper says .4285. Seeing the slug i will be better with .430

I am on the way to go to RFN for all my wheelguns, the RFN design seems to me (target and paper shooting) more friendly with the forcing cone than the square shoulder of a WC or SWC
Back to Top View pascalp's Profile Search for other posts by pascalp
 
joed
Senior Member


Avatar

Joined: February 18 2003
Location: Northern OH
Posts: 8321
Online Status: Offline
Posted: November 01 2004 at 5:00pm | IP Logged Quote joed

For the longest time I've wanted a .44 spl.   Been looking for either a 696 or a 24 but the prices are ridiculous.   One friend just sold a 696 for $500 which was in box unfired. He told me he hated the gun, said ammo for the spl was hard to come by or the choices were terrible unless you load it yourself. Having shot a few boxes of .44 spl through my 29 and 629 I have to agree.

It's not a round you can buy at Walmart. Most likely you'll be going to a gun store. And the price is more then a .44 mag for a box of ammo. Why?   Because it's just not popular.

So unless Txpete is going to offer me is 24-3 or Pascalp wants to part with his 696 at a reasonable price I'm not going to get one. I'll just continue shooting .44 mags out of my guns at .44 spl velocities.

Still like to have one though, but I'm through looking.
Back to Top View joed's Profile Search for other posts by joed Visit joed's Homepage
 
txpete
Senior Member


Avatar

Joined: October 06 2003
Location: texas
Posts: 2115
Online Status: Offline
Posted: November 01 2004 at 5:09pm | IP Logged Quote txpete

joed.. sorry not much of a chance for that to happen .when I had a 29 I shot more 240 gr swc's at 7.5 gr's of unique than any other load.mild and accurate.
pete
Back to Top View txpete's Profile Search for other posts by txpete
 
mcump
Senior Member


Avatar

Joined: January 30 2004
Location: Waco, tx
Posts: 180
Online Status: Offline
Posted: November 01 2004 at 7:59pm | IP Logged Quote mcump

Boy! He really ties it all together. I was particularly glad for the information about development of the wadcutter design. I never knew the evolution or the dating on them until now.
Back to Top View mcump's Profile Search for other posts by mcump
 
pascalp
Senior Member




Joined: July 10 2003
Posts: 445
Online Status: Offline
Posted: November 02 2004 at 12:15pm | IP Logged Quote pascalp

Joed, i hope you will find your graal soon.
I was looking for a 44spe-only when i found my 696. If i could have a 5" barrel, i will never let it go . Price won't be a problem but distance/frontier/administration will.

Edited by pascalp on November 02 2004 at 12:56pm
Back to Top View pascalp's Profile Search for other posts by pascalp
 
jcd
Newcomer




Joined: December 05 2004
Posts: 1
Online Status: Offline
Posted: December 05 2004 at 5:15pm | IP Logged Quote jcd

Good info for short barrels. When thinking about how much velocity is "enough", keep in mind all those police officers and military men who defended themselves with a 158g .357" bullet at 755 fps. Also keep in mind John Browning's original .45 Auto proposal to the U.S. Army was designed around a 200g bullet at 900 fps. (We got a 230g at 835 fps instead). Sometimes I have to remind myself just how effective today's 44 special loads are. If I don't keep that perspective, I find myself slipping into the self-delusion I really need 1000+ fps.
Back to Top View jcd's Profile Search for other posts by jcd
 
wolfdog
Senior Member


Avatar

Joined: September 20 2003
Posts: 1804
Online Status: Offline
Posted: December 05 2004 at 6:18pm | IP Logged Quote wolfdog

I'm personaly thinkig really hard about a 44 spl for the gf, it's going to be one of the charter armes pitbull pugs. Not a smith, but from what I hear a dandy little pistol for the price if loads are kept reasonable. Myself, I've always been a small bore fanatic, I love my .357 for everything. Never owned a 44 or 45, maybe someday.
Back to Top View wolfdog's Profile Search for other posts by wolfdog
 
txpete
Senior Member


Avatar

Joined: October 06 2003
Location: texas
Posts: 2115
Online Status: Offline
Posted: December 05 2004 at 6:26pm | IP Logged Quote txpete



my smith 24-3 44 special
Back to Top View txpete's Profile Search for other posts by txpete
 
stuffit
Senior Member


Avatar

Joined: January 04 2004
Location: Deep South
Posts: 4817
Online Status: Offline
Posted: December 06 2004 at 9:48pm | IP Logged Quote stuffit

Enjoyed the article on the .44 special. However, I am in the same boat as pascalp regarding the "polygonal" rifling. Is this a feature of all the Smith 696's or just some of them. Does this mean the rifling is configured like the Desert Eagle, and, I think, the Glocks. This in a revolver is new to me, even if old hat to everyone else. Are there any other Smiths that incorporate this type of feature?

stuffit

__________________
"Everybody changes their minds sometimes but a fool and a mule."
Back to Top View stuffit's Profile Search for other posts by stuffit
 
blackhawk44
Senior Member




Joined: February 11 2004
Location: Republic of Texas
Posts: 216
Online Status: Offline
Posted: December 07 2004 at 9:30am | IP Logged Quote blackhawk44

TXPETE- for a light bullet, the favorite in my seven 44 Specials has always been the 429215. Reliable, accurate and a pretty neat field load with 8-8.5gr Unique. For 44-40 bullets, either the RCBS or Magma 44-200 seem to work better in most 44's than old 427098.
Back to Top View blackhawk44's Profile Search for other posts by blackhawk44
 
justannie
Senior Member




Joined: August 28 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 436
Online Status: Offline
Posted: December 07 2004 at 3:02pm | IP Logged Quote justannie

Polygonal Rifling:

'Instead of the rifling being square and hanging down in the bore so that
it can engrave a square notch in the bullet it has flats where the
rifling would be. The bullet is not upset much. Instead of having 6 or
8 sharp knotches it will have small flats that are very unnoticeable.
This makes the bullet fly better in the wind because there is no sharp
edges to bite into a cross wind. The bullet jacket is not deformed as
much so the chances of loose cores are much less. Since there is no
sharp corners to burn off the barrel life is much longer and is
dependent on heat checking alone to end its life. That is one major
reason most barrel makers are not interested in them. It would decrease
their business by half. They are more difficult to make than regular
rifled barrels for a couple of reasons one being they are difficult to
lap and give a cut barrel maker more problems due to tooling.'

As I have only seen polygonal in my Desert Eagle 44mag, could someone tell me what this new developement in the revolver is? I have never heard of it in any revolvers.

Annie


Edited by justannie on December 07 2004 at 3:02pm


__________________
   
Back to Top View justannie's Profile Search for other posts by justannie
 
WiskyT
Senior Member




Joined: December 21 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 4054
Online Status: Offline
Posted: December 07 2004 at 5:41pm | IP Logged Quote WiskyT

polygonal rifling, lead bullets,
polygonal rifling, lead bullets,
polygonal rifling, lead bullets,
polygonal rifling, lead bullets,
polygonal rifling, lead bullets,
polygonal rifling, lead bullets...

I know I've heard this somewhere before, if I could just remember where...

__________________
"Damn your black heart Barbara Streisand!"   Eric Cartman 1998
Back to Top View WiskyT's Profile Search for other posts by WiskyT
 

Home | Load data | Articles | Ballistic Calc | Energy Calc

Page of 2 Next >>
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You can vote in polls in this forum

Powered by Web Wiz Forums version
Copyright ©2001-2008 Web Wiz Guide

This page was generated in 0.3604 seconds.